Community by and for patients to share experiences and recommendations

Judge Denies Motion To Dismiss Case Against Artas Restoration Robotics Inc

10/29/2019 7:04:19 PM

Restoration Robotics, Inc is a medical device company dedicated to hair restoration. The company produces the ARTAS System, the first computer-assisted robotic system used to harvest follicular units directly from the patient's scalp. Recently, the company has been in hot-water and subject to a class-action lawsuit. In this article, we will be discussing the denial of their motion to dismiss the class-action lawsuit. 

Why Are Restoration Robotics, Inc Being Sued?

Restoration Robotics, Inc commenced the companies initial public offering (IPO) on October 12, 2017, and closed on October 16, 2017. The lawsuit was filed to cover alleged damages caused by defendants (Restoration Robotics, Inc). The class-action lawsuit claims that Restoration Robotics, Inc was not equipped with an adequate salesforce to grow the company and business. The plaintiffs claim that the company misrepresented its salesforce and provided no marketing support. 

Partial Dismissal

The court rejected the plaintiff's argument that the defendants provided inadequate marketing support because they failed to deliver patient leads, as promised. The court found that the defendants made no representations as to the quality or quantity of leads. Regarding statements that physicians would be able to perform surgery with less staff, the court rejected this plea, because the comments were technically correct. The court also rejected the request that the procedure-based revenue failed to grow. The court noted that the defendants explicitly stated they could not predict the success, and even predicted loss of funds. 

Court Finds Alleged Misrepresentations

The court did find alleged misrepresentations concerning the devices "targeted precision and a cleanly scored incision" and the defendants "aggregate installed base growth of approximately 34%, from December 31, 2015." The court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently laid out enough facts to conclude the first statement of so-called targeted precision and clean scored incisions was inaccurate, based on an alleged statement from a confidential witness.

The second alleged statement, plaintiffs argued that defendants misrepresented the number of systems that were actually 'installed' rather than 'sold'; the court agreed that the account could be misleading. The court found that the plaintiff had adequately pled claims under sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against defendants based on just two alleged misstatements. However, the judge dismissed the rest of the pleas.

Our Thoughts

Under all of the legal jargon, there is a big takeaway. The judge agreed that claims of targeted precision and clean scored incisions were a misrepresentation. This misrepresentation speaks volumes for prospective patients. Currently, the best hair transplant surgeons perform Follicular Unit Excision (FUE) manually or with a mobile hand-held device. Now, that doesn't mean that it is impossible to have quality results with the ARTAS System. Still, the vast majority of surgeons who purchase this device are inexperienced in the field of surgical hair restoration. The physician must control this system, but in most cases, technicians control them. 


Comments:

 Add a Comment to this article . Note that all comments are moderated, so will not show immediately
  • *Name:

  • Headline/Title of your comment (50 character limit)
  • Your Email

    (will not be published)

  •  

  • Please keep your comments relevant, links are not permitted within the comment.

  • Inappropriate, or purely promotional comments may be removed.


    Comment on this article:

    All Articles by Melvin Lopez

    Melvin is an Associate Publisher and Forum Moderator for the Hair Transplant Network and the Hair Loss Learning Center. He is a 3-time hair transplant patient having received over 5,000 grafts via FUE. He has over 5,000 helpful posts on the popular hair restoration network discussion forum. He has over 13 years of experience in healthcare management. He enjoys helping hair loss sufferers overcome their insecurities and depression in relation to their hair loss. Aside from his healthcare management work, he writes articles, moderates the hair loss forum and creates YouTube videos for the Hair Transplant Network YouTube channel.